Jump to content
Duk

Adding Smoking Wood

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering what methods of adding your smoking wood were used. I personally pre burn my chunks till the thick white smoke thins out. then add my meat. Is it something I don't need to worry about?? My wood chunks are about 3 in in diameter and 2 in thick. I use 1 piece---what are some thoughts from others

Posted

I have read form several sources that they let the thick smoke burn off, too. I sometimes try to do that when I am working with roasting temps, but not with low/slow cooks. For low/slow stuff, I mix the wood in with the lump, light it, set my dampers, and let it go. When the fire hits wood, it smolders away, and we all know the magic flavor that imparts!

With roasting, I have to get the grill hot before adding food, so if I were to mix my wood in with the lump, it would all be burned up before the meat hit the grill. So I let things get up to temp, then I toss in the wood and let it smoke for a few minutes before adding the meat. There is still plenty of smoke around when I add the food, since the added airflow likely makes the wood burst into flames. (I use chunks as well)

People say the thicker smoke from a new piece of wood is bitter, but Im not sure - At least dealing with higher temps. I think the food isnt on there long enough, and the wood doesnt last long enough to get too overpowering.

Posted

I tend to agree FM --I would just like to hear the different techniques that everyone has and maybe their reasoning as to why they do what they do. I'm thinking that on my next low slow, I'll do like you do and put the meat on and let er rip---when the smoking wood smolders let it do it's thing, I just always worried it would be a little bitter ?? :?

Posted

Oddly enough I tend to like Oak flavor, so when the tongue of desire rises I use my Oak firewood.

I'll just take a split log and toss it in next to the lit coals and let it go. Most times doesn't even completely burn, but does smoke.

Posted

To soak or not to soak

Do you guys soak your wood before adding it to the lump? In my old wet smoker days, I would soak the chunks overnight. I guess I'm wondering if that is still necessary on the KK.

Posted

Re: To soak or not to soak

Do you guys soak your wood before adding it to the lump? In my old wet smoker days' date=' I would soak the chunks overnight. I guess I'm wondering if that is still necessary on the KK.[/quote']

I use chunks and I have never soaked. I think soaking may be necessary when using a high airflow cooker (gas - etc.).

Posted

I don't know from experience; but I've read soaking smoking wood only creates steam. Doesn't add anything to the smoke, other than maybe delay it while the moisture dries out.

Posted

Doesn't matter if I'm going low and slow or regular cooking, I throw the chunks in with the charcoal and then load up the meat. Smoke has never been too strong for me. I use all sorts of wood, hickory, oak, apple all seems to come out the same.

Posted

In my smokehouse in the shop I always wet down the hardwood mix sawdust. the heat source is a simple hotplate. If I don't do this I get a very strong bitter flavor. With the KK I have soaked and not soaked,can't tell the difference. Lately I'm using Jasens method and use a cast iron smoke box I picked up from HomeDepot. Never enough smoke for me, family complains sometimes. It's good to be King! :lol:

Posted

My arsenal consists of:

  • Oak
    Cherry
    Apple
    Persimmon
    Maple
    Hickory
    Grape Vine
    Peach

Never tried walnut...Let me know how it does. BTW, Peach is awesome on pork and chicken, smooth and mild like apple. If you GA guys can get your hands on some deadfall around the peach groves, give it a try.

Posted

As far as using wood on the KK, this is what I tried this weekend. I soaked wood for one cook, used dry for a second cook. I used the same amount of wood on each cook and the smoke started right away both times and lasted the duration of the cook both times. The dry wood was used on my pork butt by the way. There was still some wood left after that. For me, soaking is a thing of the gassy past.

But all this talk about apple wood, I used that a long time ago with great results on ribs. I'm gonna have to pick me up some and try it again. I remember it gave a great mild flavor to the ribs. M'mmmmmm, excuse to cook more ribs :D

Posted

For low and slow cooks the wood mostly smolders rather than burns. When you get to high temp grilling (anyone remember the reason for the book title Fahrenheit 451?) soaking can extend the time it takes to heat the wood and keep the smolder going longer, but you'd be better off with a smoke pot to reduce the oxygen to the smoke wood. A nice side effect is after the cook you get a few more chunks of charcoal. :)

FWIW: Wood generally only smolders 120-150C (250-300F), but rotted wood can ignite at the high end of this scale. Most wood ignites between 190-260C (375-500F). Granted it's hotter in the pit than the dome, but remember we're also restricting the oxygen flow into the cooker to compensate.

Posted

More than you wanted or cared to read..

anyone remember the reason for the book title Fahrenheit 451?

Mr Bradbury thought it was the temp that books would self ignite and the combustion would be self supporting.. i.e. bring it to that temperature and it will spontaneously ignite.

I don't think this is necessarily the exact temp.. too many different types of paper ;-)

But Fahrenheit 451 sounds better than 232.778° Celsius, 910.67° Rankine, 186.222° Réaumur or 505.928 Kelvin

It's also the temp of bakers used to call a "Quick Oven"

:eek::eek::eek:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...