I hate to see a post like this go unanswered. I do not have a different komado so I can't make a direct comparison, but I do know that one of the factors making it a superior cooking tool is the large mass of the unit making it far superior at heat retention. Thus less fuel is required, and less airflow is needed. This keeps the food moist. Also the shape makes the temperature across the cooking surface more uniform.
I do know that every user here that has migrated from other ceramics feel the device is superior (based on their posts here)
HTH